Canada’s peacekeeping plan not politically motivated, says top soldier

“I reject the notion that this is done simply for political reasons and putting troops in harm’s way into risky areas for anything other than the true merits of the value of the use of military force,” he said.

Vance told the Senate defence committee that his staff members are looking at various UN mission options to see where Canada could best contribute. The government still has not decided on a specific mission, he added.

Vance wouldn’t say which missions the government is currently considering, but he acknowledged that many — if not all — carry some degree of risk. He said he wouldn’t advise Canada participate in a mission with unnecessary or unmanageable risk.

“But a risky mission that has great potential of success may be a mission that you want to invest in,” he said. “And the military, we do risk. We’re good at that, if we can mitigate it.”

Some have worried that Canadian peacekeepers could be put into a no-win situation, or bound by endless UN bureaucracy that might tie their hands or otherwise put them at risk, such as in previous missions in Rwanda and Bosnia.

Vance said UN commanders might give Canadian troops specific tasks, but he would “never” let the UN have the last word on when or how Canadian peacekeepers could act. He said he is the one who writes the rules of engagement for Canadian troops, which would continue with a peacekeeping mission.

“I never relinquish Canadian command of those troops,” he said. “We have learned a lot since the days of Bosnia and Rwanda and elsewhere. And one of those is you’re never out from under Canadian command.”

— Follow @leeberthiaume on Twitter.

Lee Berthiaume, The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Canada’s peacekeeping plan not politically motivated, says top soldier

What's Happening