Nova Scotia appeal court denies wealthy couple oceanfront swimming pool

The couple’s application was denied by the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM). It said under land-use bylaws the pool was too close to the water’s edge, less than the required 30 feet, although the setback was deep enough under the city’s swimming pool bylaw.

The Ghosns undertook great expense to make room for the pool by extending their property into the Arm, which was allowed because their property includes an historic water lot.

“It seems the Ghosns decided that if HRM thought the shoreline was too close to their proposed pool, they would solve the problem by moving the shoreline farther away,” the province’s Utility and Review Board said in its earlier decision in the case.

But the city still wouldn’t issue a permit, saying any land changes past 2007, when the city updated its land-use bylaws, couldn’t be considered.

The Ghosns appealed to the Utility and Review Board, which denied them the permit, saying the land-use bylaw took precedence. They then took their case to the appeal court, saying the board’s interpretation was unreasonable.

The appeal court didn’t agree.

“The board’s decision was reasonable under this court’s standard of review,” the court said.

The court did, however, refuse to award the municipality its legal costs for the appeal.

The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Nova Scotia appeal court denies wealthy couple oceanfront swimming pool

What's Happening