Grassy Mountain coal mine. (Image: Canadian Press)

By Canadian Press

Supreme Court won’t hear appeals in Crowsnest Pass coal project case

Sep 29, 2022 | 11:08 AM

BLAIRMORE, AB – Canada’s top court won’t hear an appeal of a regulatory decision that blocked development of an open-pit coal mine in the Alberta Rockies.

In a decision released on Thursday, September 29, 2022, the Supreme Court turned down requests from a coal miner and two First Nations for leave to appeal a decision from Alberta’s energy regulator that found the proposed Grassy Mountain coal mine in the province’s Crowsnest Pass region was not in the public interest.

The dismissed applications were from the Stoney Nakoda and Piikani First Nations and Benga Mining, which had proposed to resume mining for steelmaking coal at a site that had been previously mined.

But in June 2021, a joint federal-provincial review panel said the mine’s likely environmental effects on fish and water quality would outweigh what it called the low-to-moderate economic impacts of the project. Alberta’s regulatory agency denied Benga’s permit application and the federal government soon followed.

READ MORE: Company ‘shocked’ by Ottawa’s decision on proposed coal mine in southwestern Alberta

What's Happening in Lethbridge this week: October 28-November 3, 2024

Oct 28, 2024

What's Happening in Lethbridge this week: October 21-27, 2024

Oct 21, 2024

What's Happening in Lethbridge this weekend: October 11, 2024

Oct 11, 2024

Both Benga and the two First Nations, which had signed benefits agreements with the company, first asked the Alberta Court of Appeal for leave to appeal the decision. When they were turned down, they applied to the Supreme Court.

Benga argued the joint federal-provincial review panel erred by ignoring evidence from the company on water quality, fish habitat and the project’s economics. The Piikani and Stoney Nakoda argued the panel didn’t adequately consult them on economic matters related to the exercise of their constitutional rights.

As is usual, the Supreme Court did not provide reasons for denying leave to appeal.

However, the Alberta court had found the applicants were asking justices to reconsider evidence, not correct an error in law. Justice Bernette Ho wrote that Benga was simply asking the court to prefer Benga’s expert evidence to other evidence presented.

Regulators are within their rights to decide which evidence to accept or reject, she wrote.

The Alberta decision also found the panel had plenty of information on Indigenous economic benefits and pointed out both First Nations had been free to file whatever information on those benefits they wanted.

The regulator’s decision on Benga was the first in series of decisions that has severely cramped the United Conservative government’s initial plans for a huge expansion of open-pit steelmaking coal mining in Alberta’s beloved Rockies and foothills.

Thousands of hectares were leased for exploration and several mines were proposed. Loud and near-universal public condemnation of the plans forced the government to back down and issue an order reinstating protections for the region.

That, however, has brought its own legal issues.

The province is now facing two lawsuits from coal companies affected by that reversal.

Atrum Coal Co. argues the government’s move damaged its share price, deprived its shareholders of value and made worthless millions of dollars worth of exploration work already completed. Cabin Ridge Coal, which is privately held, argues the government’s new policy amounts to expropriation of their assets.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 29, 2022.

— By Bob Weber in Edmonton

READ MORE: Alberta court denies appeal of regulator’s refusal to approve coal mine in Crowsnest Pass