Stay informed with the LNN Daily Newsletter

Closing arguments wrap up in Trevor Pritchard sex assault trial

Nov 28, 2018 | 4:24 PM

LETHBRIDGE – Cross examination continued Wednesday morning (Nov. 28) in the trial of Trevor Pritchard, who’s accused of sexual assault, luring, and possession of child pornography.

Much like Tuesday’s line of questioning, co-Crown Prosecutor Sarah Goard-Baker again questioned Pritchard about his online Facebook account, and one belonging to a person named Phillip Fieldcamper. Goard-Baker showed him a series of images, exact copies of which were sent to not only acknowledged friends, but to other females, some of whom he denied ever communicating with.

A graphic sexual description was also presented as originating from both the Phillip Fieldcamper and the Trevor Pritchard Facebook accounts, word for word. It, too, appeared in communications with at least one Facebook friend he acknowledged, along with several other females he denied ever contacting.

Goard Baker also alleged that he did in fact, have sex with one of the girls who testified on Nov. 20 on repeated occasions at his home and in his truck.

Each time the question was asked, Pritchard responded, “No, I did not.”

Goard then wrapped up her cross-examination.

“In all of your testimony yesterday and today, you have provided us with no explanation about how, when you accessed your accounts to send and receive those messages that you do adopt, you could fail to see the hundreds if not thousands of messages you deny, right?”

“Actually, I think I did earlier today when I told you I delete mine (messages), so what’s stopping someone from deleting what they’re writing?” said Pritchard.

During closing arguments, co-Defense Lawyer William Wister outlined 10 issues with the Crown’s case that he believed did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The issues included the absences of an alleged victim’s mother, and a neighbour, to whom she referred to during her testimony; a yellow rope that the now 16-year-old referred to as being in Pritchard’s room which was not listed by police as an item found during their search of his residence, and flawed information gathering by police and forensic experts.

Wister also took aim at the reliability of Facebook messages and records, telling Justice Johnna Kubik that it was a valuable resource as a social media network, but that “it’s akin to relying on the National Enquirer to prove Elvis is not dead.”

He then asked the judge to acquit Pritchard of all charges against him.

Co-Crown Prosecutor Donna Spaner replied in her closing arguments that Facebook business records were admissible documents, that the Crown has proven each alleged offence and that the court had heard from police, experts, and two alleged victims.

She said Pritchard’s testimony was “self-serving,” and “defied any sense of realism.”

Spaner also told the judge that just because Trevor Pritchard denied sending explicit messages and texts, doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.

She then said that Phillip Fieldcamper and Pritchard were the same person, and that person not only communicated with friends, but knowingly with several girls who were under the age of 16. She alleged that messages sent from both accounts were at times identical and referred to some of the exact same events.

Pritchard will be back in court December 10.