Alberta Appeal Court refuses to overturn one of killer’s three murder convictions

Der said Saretzky should never have been convicted in the woman’s death since the confession came without a lawyer present and six months after Saretzky admitted to killing Blanchette and the toddler.

The Crown argued that at the time of the police interview Saretzky would have been well aware of his right to counsel.

The three-justice Appeal Court panel unanimously dismissed the appeal.

“The appellant was not under arrest and the trial judge found he had not been detained,” wrote Justice Peter Martin on behalf of the court.

“Those findings were well supported by the evidence and are entitled to deference. I agree with his conclusion that on considering all of the circumstances of this case, the appellant’s confession would not have been excluded.”

Meketech’s body was found in her home in Coleman, Alta., on Sept. 9, 2015. She had been struck in the head and stabbed in the neck.

During the trial, the jury was shown videotaped confessions in which Saretzky told police it was a spur-of-the-moment decision to kill Meketech, who was a friend of his grandparents, because he didn’t think anyone cared about her.

Five days later, Blanchette’s body was discovered in his home in Blairmore, Alta. His daughter was missing, which sparked an Amber Alert and an extensive search in the Crowsnest Pass area of southwestern Alberta.

Court heard Saretzky was “an aspiring serial killer” at the time of the attacks. He had few close friends and possessed numerous books on serial killers and serial killings.

Saretzky was sentenced in 2017 to three consecutive life sentences, which means he is ineligible for parole until he has served 75 years in prison.

Alberta Appeal Court refuses to overturn one of killer’s three murder convictions

What's Happening